-
High Cost Pitfall: Traditional AMM pools require a market ID application and extra fees, putting financial pressure on early-stage projects.
-
Liquidity Volatility: Selecting the wrong pool type can trigger sharp price swings, undermining token credibility.
-
Inefficient Incentives: Poor liquidity setups may prevent token rewards from effectively reaching target users.

Understanding the Three Liquidity Pool Types
1. AMM Pool (Standard Pool): A Cold-Start Tool with High Costs
-
Mandatory Liquidity Lock: Burning LP tokens enables permanent liquidity locking (e.g., Meme coins launched via Pump.fun follow this approach).
-
Zero-Slippage Cold Start: Prices auto-adjust from 0 to infinity, ideal for tokens without a clear valuation anchor early on.
-
Broad Compatibility: Supported by OKX Wallet, Phantom Wallet, Jup, and more.
-
Requires an OpenBook market ID, costing 0.55 SOL to 3 SOL (tool: https://solana.pandatool.org/en/market).
-
Capital efficiency is only 10%-15%, with actual liquidity depth well below the displayed TVL.
-
Meme coins needing rapid launches without price controls.
-
Initial liquidity setup for community-driven tokens.
2. CPMM Pool (Constant Product Pool): A Step-Up for Compliance
-
Token 2022 Standard: Includes metadata features for compliance mechanisms like dividends or taxes.
-
Dynamic Fee Tiers: Fee rates range from 0.01% to 1% based on token type (0.01% for stablecoins, 1% for volatile tokens).
-
No LP token burning required, reducing creation costs to 0.4 SOL.
-
Dual-token incentives via Fusion Pools lower reward expenses for projects.
-
Utility tokens needing transaction taxes or dividends (e.g., GameFi projects).
-
Compliant tokens aiming to onboard institutional market makers.
3. CLMM Pool (Concentrated Liquidity Pool): The Go-To for Stablecoin Projects
-
Permissionless Creation: Anyone can set up a pool without market ID fees.
-
Precise Price Anchoring:
-
Allows a tight ±1% fluctuation range (e.g., stablecoins locked at $0.99-$1.01).
-
Delivers up to 400x liquidity depth compared to AMM pools with the same capital.
-
-
Supports dual-token rewards (one must be a pool token).
-
Liquidity positions are NFTized, preventing chaotic community exits.
-
Stablecoins or anchored assets (e.g., LST) requiring tight control.
-
Mid-to-long-term projects building a price moat via liquidity mining.
Key Decision Factors Comparison
Factor
|
AMM Pool
|
CPMM Pool
|
CLMM Pool
|
---|---|---|---|
Creation Cost
|
High
|
Low
|
Medium
|
Price Control
|
Fully Flexible
|
Limited (via fees)
|
Precise Range
|
Capital Efficiency
|
10%-15%
|
30%-50%
|
70%-90%
|
Support Level
|
Universal
|
Partial
|
Moderate
|
Unique Trait
|
Market ID Fee
|
Token 2022 Support
|
Price Stability
|
Step-by-Step: Creating a Liquidity Pool
-
Visit PandaTool’s liquidity creation page: https://solana.pandatool.org/en/createpool
Conclusion: Liquidity as a Moat
本文由PandaAcademy原创,如若转载,请注明出处:https://academy.pandatool.org/en_US/solana/223
。PandaAcademy是PandaTool旗下的Web3学习中心,专注于向普通用户提供区块链和加密货币知识输出