In the crypto world, “transactions are irreversible, and code is law.” If you know nothing about smart contracts but want to avoid being exploited by malicious permissions like “blacklisting, minting new tokens, or honeypots,” PandaTool provides a practical, step-by-step self-inspection process to minimize your risks—all achievable without understanding a single line of Solidity code.
Why Should You Care About “Permissions”?
In short: If a contract still has an “Owner/Permissions” that haven’t been renounced, the people behind it can change the rules at any time (mint new tokens, pause transfers, blacklist you, withdraw liquidity, etc.). Blockchain’s transparency is a double-edged sword here—you can check, but you must also know how to check.
Step-by-Step Practical Guide (No Developer Skills Needed)
-
Start with an Automated Scanner for Initial Screening (Fast, Low Barrier)
Paste the token contract address into platforms like Token Sniffer or GoPlus Security to get a preliminary risk report (indicating if the contract is suspicious, contains common dangerous functions, has abnormal token distribution, etc.). This is the essential “first filter.” These tools cover multiple chains and provide intuitive conclusions, ideal for quick screening. -
Verify on the Block Explorer if the Contract “Source Code is Public and Verified”
On the relevant block explorer (Etherscan, BscScan, etc.), check the contract page: See if the “Contract / Code” tab shows “Verified,” and if you can view the source code and “Owner” information. Unverified source code or numerous “Unknown” markers are high-risk signals. Etherscan provides instructions for contract verification; confirming the source code is visible is a key step. -
Check if the “Owner / Permissions” Have Been Renounced
The contract page or automated detectors will show if there’s an owner/admin address and whether functions likerenounceOwnership()
have been called. As long as the project team hasn’t explicitly renounced permissions, there’s a risk of manipulation (e.g., minting or freezing tokens anytime). This can be quickly checked via Etherscan’s “Read/Write Contract” tab or audit/scanner interfaces. -
Check if Liquidity (LP) is “Genuinely Locked”
Unlocked liquidity, or locks from unknown addresses, are common rug-pull tactics. Verify on dedicated liquidity lock platforms or the project’s lock page (e.g., Unicrypt, UNCX) to confirm the LP token lock contract address, unlock time, and find specific lock records in their UI. Be highly cautious if no lock proof is found or the lock period is very short. -
Examine Token Distribution & Whale Holdings (Risk of Manipulation)
Check the percentage held by the top addresses on the block explorer or DEX/data platforms. If the top few addresses hold the vast majority of tokens, the risk of the project being manipulated by “whales” is extremely high. Tools and charts (like DEXTools or the “Holders” tab on explorers) make this clear. -
“Test with a Small Amount” and “Double-Check Before Major Transactions”
When safety isn’t 100% confirmed, first test with a tiny amount (e.g., 0.0001 ETH) to confirm the recipient address, successful transfer, and your ability to sell/withdraw liquidity. Always copy and paste the full address—don’t just check the first and last few characters. Many victims get tricked by only verifying the “ending digits.” -
Review Community & Audits: Look for Third-Party Audits and User Feedback
Audit reports from firms like CertiK or PeckShield reduce risk (but don’t eliminate it). Also, search the contract address or token name on Twitter, Reddit, Telegram, Zhihu, etc., to see if users report issues like “can’t sell,” “blacklisted,” or “contract can mint more tokens.” User feedback is often more telling than whitepapers. -
Watch for “Common Dangerous Functions” – Know the Keywords, Even Without Coding
If scanners or the block explorer show functions likemint
,burnFrom
,blacklist
,pause
,updateTax
,transferFrom
controlled by the owner, it often means risk of arbitrary manipulation (minting, freezing, setting high taxes, etc.). Scanners flag these risks; pay attention to their presence.
Practical Tool List (Ready to Use)
-
Token Sniffer: Quick “sniff test” for token contracts (detects common scam patterns).
-
GoPlus Security (GPS): Real-time risk detection for wallets/transactions/tokens; user-side tool.
-
Etherscan / BscScan / Solscan: On-chain source for contract verification, owner status, holders, and transaction history.
-
Unicrypt / UNCX / Team.Finance: Liquidity lock query and proof pages to confirm LP locking status and unlock time.
-
DEXTools / DEX Explorer: View trading depth, holding distribution, buy/sell differences (helps identify honeypots/taxes/sell restrictions). (Accessible via common DEX data platforms).
Quick “Zero-Tech” Risk Assessment Checklist
-
Is the contract source code verified? (No → High Risk)
-
Is the contract still controlled by an owner who hasn’t renounced permissions? (Yes → High Risk)
-
Is the liquidity genuine and locked? (No → High Risk)
-
Is the token concentration overly high? (Yes → High Risk)
-
Are there ongoing user/community reports of issues? (Yes → High Risk)
If any item above triggers “High Risk,” be extremely cautious—avoid large investments, or simply abandon the project if necessary.
PandaTool Summary (Three-Piece Advice for Non-Coders)
-
Check First, Invest Later: Paste the contract address into Token Sniffer/GoPlus, check source code and owner on Etherscan, confirm liquidity is locked.
-
Don’t Just Check the Address Tail, Don’t Trust “History”: Always copy-paste the full address and test with a small amount.
-
When in Doubt, Back Out: There are endless opportunities to make money, but you only lose your principal once.
© Original content by PandaAcademy
Unauthorized reproduction prohibited. Credit required when sharing.
PandaAcademy, a Web3 educational brand by PandaTool, positions as an open skills academy for the Web3 era.
本文由PandaAcademy原创,如若转载,请注明出处:https://academy.pandatool.org/en_US/kn/1855
。PandaAcademy是PandaTool旗下的Web3学习中心,专注于向普通用户提供区块链和加密货币知识输出